http://pindz.blogspot.com/ – http://annunaki.wz.cz/
Free Energy Electric Magnetic Power Generator Sky News Australia
Duration : 0:4:17
Dec
31
Dec
30
http://snurl.com/freeelectric Thank you, thank you… thank you!! I have to be honest, I had my doubts about this product, but I decided to take the bait, worked perfectly well, I think you really might be on to something with this technology. I wonder why isn’t everyone using this?
Duration : 0:1:41
Dec
29
Cost
Now let us consider spending. According to Portfolio.com, the combined cost of the Iraq war (Operation Iraqi Freedom, in Pentagon jargon) and its companions, Operation Enduring Freedom, in Afghanistan, and the Global War on Terror, could easily top $600 billion this year. But the overall cost is even higher, exceeding perhaps $2 trillion. The annual congressional appropriations for the wars — averaging $127 billion — are bigger than the global markets for soap, heroin, or gambling. And the spending is growing. Monthly spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan averaged $6.8 billion in 2006. That figure is now closer to $8 billion a month.
Portfolio adds:
At that rate of burn, General Electric’s value would be wiped out in three and a half years, Bill Gates’ personal fortune would evaporate in just seven months, and the troubled Ford Motor Co. would cease to exist in a matter of weeks. If you think of the wars as a giant impulse buy using an unlimited credit card, then paying it off would require coming up with enough cash to match the GDP of three Irelands or about 11 Kuwaits or the Netherlands — but only if you throw in Sri Lanka.
Before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Colin Powell warned President Bush that if you break it, you buy it. At last count, we’ve bought the equivalent of 10 Iraqs with your tax dollars. But instead of buying 10, the money has gone to completely destroying one country.
But surely this money is going to more than just war. What about the effort to rebuild Iraq’s infrastructure? Well, if you know anything about government building projects, you know there is not a record of success. Pick any Section-8 housing project anywhere in the country and you will find a long record of mismanagement, misallocation, and waste. So it is in Iraq. These reconstruction projects that war supporters have heralded have amounted to little or nothing.
At the Baghdad airport, for example, your tax dollars paid for $11.8 million in new electrical generators. But $8.6 million worth of them are no longer functioning. The problems with generators in Baghdad are legendary: low oil, broken fuel lines, missing batteries, and the like. The water purification system for the city is no longer working. At the maternity hospital in Erbil, an incinerator for medical waste was padlocked and officials can’t find the key. So syringes, bandages, and drug vials are clogging the sewage system and contaminating the water.
Now, how did we get all this information? A federal oversight agency went to inspect a sample of eight projects that US officials in Iraq had declared to be a success. Of these eight successes, seven of them were not actually functioning at all due to plumbing and electrical failure, poor maintenance, looting, and just general neglect. Keep in mind that these are the projects that the US government declared successes! The failures must be abysmal beyond belief.
So too with myriad state programs, among which is the Global War on Terror. There is no standard by which it can be considered a success. But as we know, data only get you so far. If you ask the people who the establishment considers to be experts in terrorism, they are united in one belief: we aren’t spending enough money on the effort. Every agency needs more power and money, they say. The reason for the failure is a lack of resources. If we would just fork over more, all will be well.
It is precisely this rationale that led socialism in Russia to last 70 years and drive the entire country into the ground. Those of us who watched this calamity from a distance were astonished that a failure could last so long. Can’t the government look around and see what a disaster they have created? Can’t they see that while their people were lining up blocks for a scrap of bread and dying at the age of 60, ours were shopping in massive department stores and living to 70 and 75? Why isn’t it obvious what a failure socialism has been?
Well, one thing is clear in the social sciences: nothing is obvious to the experts. The reason has to do with their perception of cause and effect. The supporters of socialism always believed that more money and better management would take care of the problem. Every failure was caused by something outside of the system that a perfection of the management system would correct.
So it is with the war on terror. All the experts counsel more spending and power. It never occurs to them that the war itself is the problem. All problems are blamed on some other factor: sectarianism, outside interference, a demagogic new leader, poor management, or what have you. The excuses can be manufactured without end.
And then there is the overwhelming factor that the war on terror can only be considered a failure from the point of view of the stated aims. It is not a failure for those who directly benefit from the increased funding and power. And it is an indisputable fact that the government has benefited massively from the war on terror.
Ludwig von Mises said that the great accomplishment of economists was to draw attention to the extreme limits on the power of government. His point was not merely that government should be limited, but that it is limited by the very structure of reality. It cannot make all people rich by its own initiative. It cannot provide universal housing, literacy, and health. It cannot raise wages across the board. It cannot ban products. Those who seek to accomplish economic ends such as these are choosing the wrong means. That is because there is something more powerful than government: namely economic law.
And what is economic law? It is a force that operates within the structure of all societies everywhere that governs the production and allocation of material resources and time according to strict bounds of what is possible. Some things are just not possible. It just so happens that this includes most of the demands that are made by the public and pressure groups on the government. This was the great discovery of the modern science of economics. This was not known by the ancients. It was not known by the fathers of the early church. It was the discovery of the medieval schoolmen, and the insight was gradually elaborated upon and systematized over the centuries, culminating in the classical and Austrian traditions of thought.
The power of government to do what we desire is strictly limited. Those who do not understand this point do not understand economics. And the economic teaching has a broader implication that concerns the organization of society itself. Government is not free to make and unmake society as it sees fit. It is not a tool we can use to fulfill our private dreams. Society is too complicated, too far reaching, too much a reflection of the free volition of individual actors, for government to be able to accomplish its ends. Most often, what government attempts to do — whether abolish poverty, end liquor consumption, or make all citizens literate and healthy — ends up backfiring and generating the exact opposite.
L.H. Rockwell
Now let’s consider the cost of defeat:
Loss of freedom
Loss of liberty
Loss of life
Loss of property
Loss of country
Dec
29
Yes, everyday when the sun is shining outside the window, we shut our doors and windows and switch on electric bulbs for our lighting purpose. This is gross misuse of electricity. One 40 watt bulb burning for 25 hours consumes one unit of electricity i.e., about seven units per month. Even if ten lakh people use his method of lighting their homes, 7 lakh units could be saved in one month! In addition u get free light, reduce CO2 and global warming, save fossil fuels, coal etc.
With fossil fuels fast depleting and harming the atmosphere and the planet’s health, it is imperative that governments the world over switch on to solar power. Excuses can no longer put off this.
Browse this World Bank honored innovative method and do it at your home. http://dmblog.worldbank.org/mirrors-can-bring-light-rural-homes.
Save the world – It is now or never – 1 unit of electricity saved is equal to 3 units generated. It is sooo simple. All can do it. No charges
Jari
I just want to confirm that I am preaching only what I am practising. Read what I have written and then get back. Bye for now
1 unit saved is equal to 3 units generated. To generate 1 unit, we require either oil or coal or water + cost of machineries/equipments+labour +overheads+transmission loss. All these have values. Nothing comes free. The cost of generation is equal to 3. If u need details, mail to vkumar_m@yahoo.com
I’m not sure if the term I would apply to our electricity consumption is "misusing". I think there is a staggering about of efforts and initiatives we should be pursuing to reduce our dependency on fossil fuels and overall dependency on electricity coming to us off the main grid.
In the next 10 days the office building I work in will no longer have florescent lighting — we will have shifted over to natural lighting (skylights, additional wall windows, glass partitions, etc.), energy smart light bulbs and will operate off of solar panels when possible.
Next year they are planning on green a number of sections of the roof to help reduce our energy use even further.
Dec
29
i am working on a research about wireless power supply
Change of magnetic feild around a conductor results to a current flow through that conductor. Now i cannot understand what is meant by magnetic waves????, there are electromagnetic waves. And to say EM waves can support instruments as it consits of electrical & magnetic domains, so there is no question of generation of electricity as EM waves have magnetic and electrical disturbances mutually perpendicular to each other (See Maxwell’s Equation). And it is the white noise present in atmosphere (which is EM waves) generate lasers from small laser torches.
Dec
28
Sky news free energy electric magnetic power generator turbine australia
One day, maybe today, such generators would be reality.
You want tohave your own, just contact me and i will help you to make it for free.
Duration : 0:4:17
Dec
27
http://tinyurl.com/y9vbcwk
To find out how to kill your power bill visit:
http://tinyurl.com/y9vbcwk
Duration : 0:1:25
Dec
25
In my opinion this device is a variant and the successor to the “Magnetstromapparat” and the “Stromerzeuger” (= Magnetic Current Apparatus / Electricity Generator; see the Coler Report).
It is NOT dependent on earths magnetic field, can operate everywhere, even in space or on the moon, without fuel and without moving parts. As the magnetic field is rotating in itself, the power can be increased considerably by increasing the “rotating” frequency and even more, when we will be able to use superconductors at room temperature.
http://www.chavaenergy.com
http://www.ultraconductors.com
http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/energy21/coler2.htm
http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/emenergy.pdf
http://magneticpowerinc.com/patent.html
http://akoil.ru/content/view/10/2/
Duration : 0:5:47
Dec
25
if we start an egine and allowed to run.here the chemical energy of fuel is converted into heat.further this heat energy is converted into mechanical energy of rotating shaft.if this shaf is connected to a generator it will produce electric energy & if connectd to pump it will lift fluid.what happens to that energy if we leave that shaft rotate free with out using..is that entire enrgy transferred to AIR surrounding shaft…??????
All energy eventually ends up as heat. It’s a consequence of the second law of thermodynamics
Dec
25
I am attempting to make the world a greener place but really just trying to save some green myself. At my apartment complex water/sewer are free and gas/electric are metered. Thus…I am wondering if there is a home hydrogenerator, something small that could run one appliance (such as a my fridge) off of a garden hose. Thanks!
-Corbin
P.S.
I does NOT have to recycle the water, simply generate electricity using the pressure of the hose and have an "out" nozel for me to deal with the "used" water. Thanks again!
I’ll need to know the water pressure and flow rate to calculate the horsepower you will be able to produce.